Today’s world is a perplexing place for all of us. For the elderly among us, can you ever remember a time twenty years ago when you could not rely on what you read to be true? I am a 75-year-old physician and I cannot.
What is fake news? Does it matter if it doesn’t hurt us? Some time ago, a couple other fellow physicians and I were talking and we no longer know what to believe in medical journals. I know this may sound frightening to all of our patients but it is just as chilling to the medical profession. How do we give our patients first rate care if what we are led to believe in journals and trusted sources is not true? The following information is necessary for all Americans to know.
A couple of years ago I wrote a blog about not using the vaccine Gardasil. This was the main vaccine at the time given to protect young girls against the Human Papilloma Virus. Sounds good on the surface doesn’t it? But I encountered numerous bad outcomes including deaths from the use of the vaccine. A couple of years later all the sources I had used to justify my thinking were no longer available on the Internet. How does that happen without manipulating what we are led to read?
Please read the following from one of our trusted Journals of the American Medical Association. Draw your own conclusion and I will also tell you what I think. The following from: Kuehn, B. (Feb 3, 2010). Office of Inspector General: CDC Lax in Policing Advisors’ Conflicts of Interest. The Journal of the American Medical Association303. 5 412
There are no restrictions with regard to conflicts of interest for the employees of the CDC or for those of the FDA (Kuehn, 2010). Each employee of either agency is allowed to own stock in drug companies. There is of course the revolving door. The most blatant example of revolving door corruption may be the action of the former director of the CDC, Julie Gerberding. Gerberding blocked the CDC’s planned retraction of their recommendation for HPV vaccine after significant numbers of girls had died or been rendered paralyzed by the HPV vaccine.
Soon after blocking the retraction, Gerberding was offered and took a position at Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, the world’s bestselling HPV vaccine, as head of Merck Vaccines Department (Reuters, 2009). It is a level of corruption we would expect to see in only third world countries.
Kuehn, B. (Feb 3, 2010). Office of Inspector General: CDC Lax in Policing Advisors’ Conflicts of Interest. The Journal of the American Medical Association303. 5 412
An added note from me. Julie Gerberding’s net worth now is at least $5.93 million USD. Interesting how people get rich by helping the drug companies make billions knowing perhaps their vaccine is not safe.
There is no Cervical Cancer crisis or epidemic. The CDC & FDA allowed Merck to violate policy by Fast Tracking this drug. A drug is Fast Tracked if there is a WORLD wide imminent threat to the health of the world OF A CONTAGION. HPV vaccines DO NOT FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY. THEREFORE THE CDC, FDA, WHO AND MERCK VIOLATED THAT POLICY.
This was illegal. The FDA requires new vaccines to undergo testing and a waiting period of 4 years. Gardasil was developed and on the market in 6 months, with FDA approval. The FDA approved the increase in Aluminum in Gardasil 9 without any scientific justification.
“10 December 2014: The FDA approved the use of a reportedly “new and improved” version of Gardasil, which will be marketed as Gardasil 9. According to the FDA approval letter, this action was taken without consultation with VRBPAC (the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) which is responsible for reviewing and evaluating data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use of vaccines and related biological products.
The FDA approval letter, signed by Marion Gruber, Director of Office of Vaccines Research and Review CBER, states the reason for bypassing the advice of VRBPAC writing:
“We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues which would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion.”
So, the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) committee took it upon themselves to decide there were “no concerns or controversial issues” regarding the approval of Gardasil 9?
This division of CBER decided there would be no benefit from “an advisory committee discussion”?
According to their own mission statement, the FDA is “responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.”
Back to reality fellow Americans. It was really disheartening to read one post stating one thing America does that other countries do not do is they never let the good of the American people be a deterrent to making money.
Why would an American believe that the fast track offered to drugs and vaccines that have killed people, sometimes many, would be immune to corruption???
God bless all of you,
Rick R. Redalen, M.D., Maverick Doctor
If you would like to know more about me, please pick up God’s Tiniest Angel and the Last Unicorn, available on Amazon.